Leing (sic) Down a Gift Law
In Hawaii, "Aloha" is not just a greeting. It also is a way of
treating people, of thanking them. In other words, it often involves
a gift. That explains the headline of <a href="http://www.civilbeat.com/articles/2013/07/01/19418-can-too-much-aloha-b…; target="”_blank”">a
Honolulu <i>Civil Beat</i> article yesterday</a>, "Can Too Much Aloha Be
Attorneys on an EC, and Ethics Proceeding Confidentiality
Lawyers and confidentiality can both be serious obstacles to the effectiveness of a
government ethics program. An ethics case in Trumbull, CT provides a
good look at how this can happen.<br>
<br>
<b>Attorneys on an Ethics Commission</b><br>
According to <a href="http://www.trumbulltimes.com/11080/ethics-complaint-dismissed-herbst-ba…; target="”_blank”">an
Ethics Reform IV - Allen County and Columbus, IN et al
<b>Allen County, IN</b><br>
According to <a href="http://www.journalgazette.net/article/20130615/LOCAL/306159987/1002/LOC…; target="”_blank”">an
Current Ethics Reform III - Prince George's County, MD and Kenosha, WI
<b>Prince George's County, MD</b><br>
Prince George's County had a big scandal involving the county
executive back in 2010. The new county executive vowed to make
serious ethics reform a priority, and did some valuable things in
Current Ethics Reform II - Phoenix
In June, the Phoenix council took a step toward ethics reform,
based on the recommendations of a task force (I critiqued the task
force recommendations in an April post entitled<span> </span>"<a href="http://www.cityethics.org/content/disappointing-report-ethics-task-forc…; target="”_blank”">Disappointing
Current Ethics Reform I - Orange County and Oakland, CA
Over the last few weeks, while I was putting the finishing touches
on the second edition of the book <a href="http://www.cityethics.org/ethics%20book" target="”_blank”"><i>Local Government
Ethics Programs</i></a>, there was a lot of action in the area of
ethics reform. In the next few blog
posts, I will summarize the action.<br>
<br>
Voting For or Against Is Not the Question; Independence Is the Answer
Some people incorrectly believe that a conflict of interest requires an official
not to vote in such a way as to benefit himself. That is, if the
official might benefit from a vote, it's okay for him to vote
against it, because that shows that the official is not seeking to
benefit himself.<br>
<br>
What is odd is to see this position taken by an ethics commission.
Attacking Instead of Asking
According to <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_23453397/colorado-secretary-s…; target="”_blank”">an
article in the Denver <i>Post</i> last week,</a>these are the words of Colorado's Secretary of State after the state
ethics commission found him in violation of an ethics provision, on
account of using state funds to attend the Republican national
A Council Member Who's a Realtor, and Matters Affecting Property Values
Does a council member who is a realtor have a conflict with respect
to any council matter that affects real estate, including a matter that affects property values ? That appears to be
the view of NJ Superior Court Judge Grasso in a decision this week,
according to <a href="http://www.app.com/article/20130619/NJNEWS/306190125/Voting-conflict-pu…; target="”_blank”">an
List of Best Practices
The greatly improved and expanded second edition of City Ethics' resource book <a href="http://www.cityethics.org/ethics%20book" target="”_blank”"><i>Local Government Ethics Programs</i></a>
will be up on the City Ethics website this weekend. See the