Skip to main content

An Ethics Complaint Against a Lawyer on a Local EC

Many people think that lawyers make
the best ethics commission members. In fact, many ethics codes
require that at least some members of an ethics commission be
lawyers.<br>
<br>
However, lawyers are the individuals most likely to have
relationships and obligations that conflict with the obligations
they have as EC members. For example, they often have relationships
with elected officials, who are often lawyers themselves, as well as
with clients who seek special benefits from the local government.

The Conflicts That Arise When Coroners Are Part of a Sheriff Office

<a href="http://www.bakersfieldcalifornian.com/opinion/our-view/x1997481126/When…; target="”_blank”">A
Bakersfield <i>Californian</i> editorial on Saturday</a> points out the kinds of conflict situation that arise when, to save money, a
coroner office is brought into a sheriff or police department
office.<br>
<br>

Why Ethics Proceedings Should Not Be Delayed Due to a Criminal Proceeding

<a href="http://articles.courant.com/2013-11-15/news/hc-ed-hartford-treasurer-et…; target="”_blank”">A
Hartford <i>Courant</i> editorial on Friday</a> asked a question that is
not asked enough, Why delay an ethics investigation until a criminal
investigation is complete? Another such question that is not asked

The Sale of Special Access to Confidential Information

<a href="http://parentsunitedphila.com/2013/11/15/is-right-to-know-the-new-pay-t…; target="”_blank”">A
recent post on Philadelphia's Parents United for Public Education
blog</a> raises an issue that pulls together FOI and confidential
information issues. Entitled "Is 'right to know' the new 'pay
to play'?", the post is about Parents United's attempt to make

"Unfair Competitive Advantage" in Procurement Matters

<a href="http://www.comptroller.tn.gov/repository/SA/pa13044.pdf%27&quot; target="”_blank”">A
November audit by Tennessee's Comptroller</a> applies the <a href="http://www.acquisition.gov/far/index.html&quot; target="”_blank”">Federal
Acquisition Regulation</a> (FAR) to a state procurement situation,

Seattle Rejects Public Financing and Embraces District Council Elections

In my estimation, Seattle voters made a big mistake last week. They
voted for two related changes to their government. One was a public
campaign financing program for citywide council elections. The other
was a change from citywide council elections to district council
elections, which would leave only two citywide positions.<br>
<br>
Public financing was rejected 51.6% vs. 48.4%. Council districts
were accepted 65.6% vs. 34.4%. Both votes will lead to more
institutional corruption in Seattle. By this, I mean the legal