Winter Reading: Robert Dahl's "Who Governs?"
I just finished reading the classic political science book <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=-L99RHLc3WoC" target="”_blank”"><i>Who Governs?
Democracy and Power in an American City</i></a> by Robert A. Dahl
(Yale University Press, 1961). It might have been the second time
around, because I did take an Urban Politics course forty years ago. The book happens to focus on
New Haven, the city in whose suburbs I live and whose public
campaign financing program I used to administer.<br>
<br>
Who governs? is a question that is too rarely asked by those
involved in government ethics. It is assumed that the only
individuals who should be under an ethics program's jurisdiction are
those currently in government office or with a government job. Often
excluded from jurisdiction are numerous individuals who may be very
important to the management of the community, including former
officials, candidates, consultants and hired professionals
(including outside auditors), advisers, party officers, power
brokers and fixers, bidders on contracts, grant and permit
applicants, those who own and manage contractors that do government
work, such as charter schools and waste management companies, and
those who work for independent, semi-independent, and public-private
offices, agencies, and authorities. All of these people should be included in a local government ethics program.<br>
<br>
<b>Examples of Ethical Misconduct</b><br>
In his book, Dahl discussed some interesting examples of ethical
misconduct. For example, an investigation begun in 1959 showed that
"on many occasions assessors had illegally reduced assessments —
more often, it turned out, for friends and relatives of political
figures than for the Notables or the large corporations.… There are
certain tacit understandings in the local political culture that
sophisticated participants can hope to rely on. If a firm protests
its assessments and threatens to appeal to the courts, the city's
attorneys may conclude that the reasonable course — particularly in
view of genuine uncertainty over whether the city's claims will hold
up in court — is to reduce the assessment. Later, the firm's
executives may contribute funds generously to the campaign of the
incumbent administration." (p. 80)<br>
<br>
One comic instance of ethical misconduct involved a minor subleader
who showed how influential he was by "fixing" parking tickets. When
this practice was discovered and investigated, it turned out that he
was paying the fines out of his own pocket, because he didn't
actually have the influence he wanted people to believe he had.<br>
<br>
<b>The Role of Democratic Ritual</b><br>
Dahl was especially interested in the role of democratic ritual in
local politics. He noted that, "to gain legitimacy for their actions
leaders frequently surround their covert behavior with democratic
rituals. These rituals not only serve to disguise reality and thus
to complicate the task of observation and analysis, but — more
important — in complex ways the very existence of democratic
rituals, norms, and requirements of legitimacy based on a widely
shared creed actually influences the behavior of both leaders and
constituents even when democratic norms are violated." (p. 89) This
is something I have often noticed. Even when it appears that those
in charge are ignoring the rules, people accept that these officials, and
especially government attorneys, may interpret and apply the rules for
their own benefit, because they are playing their roles in the democratic
ritual, while those protesting the officials' decisions and involvement are calling the roles and the ritual
into question.<br>
<br>
Dahl's descriptions of the way local politics works clarify why it is so hard for good government organizations
and the news media to get improvements made in a local government ethics program. For
example, he wrote that "a political issue can hardly be said to
exist unless and until it commands the attention of a significant
segment of the political stratum [the individuals deeply involved in local politics]. … Although political issues are
sometimes generated by individuals in the apolitical strata who
begin to articulate demands for government action, this occurs only
rarely." In other words, it is not enough for people in the
community to raise the issue of government ethics reform. Politicians won't deal with the issue unless they feel they have no other choice, and even then, they will simply pass a
window-dressing amendment unless they believe that this won't do the trick. It requires a lot of work not only to get ethics reform on the agenda, but to make sure that this leads to true ethics reform.<br>
<br>
<b>Blue-Ribbon Commissions</b><br>
Dahl wrote about the effectiveness of the blue-ribbon Citizens
Action Commission that a New Haven mayor established to help with acceptance of
his downtown redevelopment projects. "The mere fact that the
CAC existed and regularly endorsed the proposals of the city
administration made the program appear nonpartisan, virtually
nullified the effectiveness of partisan attacks, presented to the
public an appearance of power and responsibility diffused among a
representative group of community notables, and inhibited criticisms
of even the most daring and ambitious parts of the program." (p.
133) But, in fact, the CAC was a passive body that had neither power nor responsibility.<br>
<br>
The same thing can be done with blue-ribbon ethics advisory boards
that are employed by a mayor or council, after a big scandal, to
give the government an ethics code, when what is really needed is an
independent ethics program with teeth that truly gains the public's
trust and prevents ethical misconduct and the scandals that it
causes. Too rarely do people recognize that a blue-ribbon advisory
board is a weak alternative to bringing in experts, which is the way
a government deals with other problems when it has no experts on
staff. Nor do people recognize that pillars of a community are busy people who often do
not want to rock the boat (i) because they, their businesses, and the
organizations with which they are associated often seek special benefits
from the government, and (ii) because there are issues that mean more to
them than the fine points of government ethics administration and,
therefore, they are not willing to take strong stands or do the
research necessary to even ask the right questions of the government
attorneys who advise them.<br>
<br>
Blue-ribbon advisory boards can be very useful when their members
are considered to have knowledge of and strong feelings about the
topic, because in that case, political leaders will be forced to
take their feelings into account. But if they lack knowledge and
strong feelings, the members of such boards will usually be happy to
accept mediocre or even poor solutions that are presented with
confidence and legal arguments that someone who actually had a knowledge of the
topic could easily oppose.<br>
<br>
<b>A Couple of Direct Descriptions of Urban Politics</b><br>
What is most valuable in this book are Dahl's very direct
descriptions of urban politics. They're a pleasure to read and think
about. For example, he says straight out that "appointments to the
board of zoning appeals were among the most coveted political prizes
in the city, since the capacity to grant or refuse variances to
zoning regulations could be used to induce payoffs of various
kinds." (p. 190)<br>
<br>
On the same page, Dahl noted that "the Mayor and the Corporation
Counsel constituted whatever center of coordination and control
existed. When conflict occurred these two men were usually drawn
sooner or later into negotiations, and their wishes carried weight."
And yet, in most jurisdictions, it is this powerful corporation
counsel, or whatever he is called, who plays the central role in a
city or county's ethics program. Rarely does that individual openly
admit that he is anything but a legal counselor to officials. Never
have I seen such an individual say that he is the mayor's partner or
that he is politically negotiating with the very people he is
providing ethics advice to and sometimes even prosecuting for ethics
violations.<br>
<br>
Robert Wechsler<br>
Director of Research-Retired, City Ethics<br>
<br>
---